Compression project.
 Compression project (most info is in Russian) >> About
In English: Video >> Public filters | Com. filters | Video Codecs Comparisons |
Our Video Codecs | Video Quality Metrics     ||     New: Compression Catalog!

  Personal (English) >> V.Yoockin | A.Ratushnyak
In Russian: "Compression Methods" book | Arctest | Download | FIDO | Forum | Links
---------------------------------------------------------
Hot news:
* 4-th H.264 codecs test!
* Million filters downloads!
* Video Quality Metric 1.5!
If you find a spelling error, please select an incorrect text and press Ctrl+Enter. Thank you!
Compression project >> Video Area Home  
РУССКИЙ

MSU Frame Rate Conversion Method

MSU Graphics & Media Lab (Video Group)

Algorithm, ideas: Dr. Dmitriy Vatolin
Algorithm, implementaion: Sergey Grishin

See also:

Algorithm allows to double frame rate (fps) of the video stream. This conversion is performed by calculating and inserting the new frames in the stream (see picture).

fps x2 scheme
Double up-conversion of the frame rate

The main advantages of the method are:

  • high accuracy of motion tracking and compensation
  • constant temporal sharpness level of the frames in converted video stream
This is achieved by construction of compensated frames with quarter pixel accuracy. Such high accuracy is obtained by using of bilinear and bicubic interpolation. Second advantage means that interpolated frames have the same sharpness as the original ones. Note that such the feature is not common for the majority of methods of this kind.

 

Examples

Here we present a results of comparison of described (MSU), Frame Repetition (FR) and Linear Interpolation (LI) methods on "akiyo" sequence. Results include PSNR metric visualization of interpolated frames in comparison to original ones on the right side. Following is the color semantics on these images: red color - high difference region, this difference is visually noticeable; yellow - little less than previous difference; green and blue - almost unnoticeable difference; black - no difference.

akiyo sequence
Performance of MSU, LI and FR methods at "akiyo" sequence

On the pictures bellow there are the frames from sequences with four times increased frame rate. Such the up-conversion is achieved by repeated using of FRC method in accordance to picture:

akiyo sequence
Four times frame rate up-conversion

On the next picture there is the comparison of MSU and LI FRC methods by the example of conversion of "waterfall" sequence:

Waterfall.avi MSU x4
Waterfall.avi LI x4
Performance of MSU and LI at "waterfall" sequence

Quality comparison of MSU, LI and FR methods is shown at the graphs bellow. In vertical direction there is PSNR quality level of interpolated frames in comparison to original ones (the higher values of metric means the higher quality of interpolated frames), in horizontal direction interpolated frame numbers are marked.

bbc psnr graph bus psnr graph foreman psnr graph Performance quality of MSU, LI and FR at "BBC", "buc", "foreman" sequences

Below there is a comparison of MSU and UCSD (University of California, San Diego) FRC methods. Sequences with four times increased frame rate were used for this comparison:

Dogs.avi MSU x4
Dogs.avi UCSD x4
Comparison of MSU and UCSD methods by the example of sequence "dogs"

On the pictures bellow it is easy to see the sharpness difference on frames, which were calculated by increasing FPS four times:

MSU & UCSD sharpness
Frames of MSU and UCSD methods for sequence "dogs"

Two sequences where the quality difference of MSU and UCSD methods can be clearly seen are available for download. In these sequences each frame contains the same part of frame from sequence processed by FR, MSU and LI. This method of sequence generation makes comparison of FRC methods easy and comfortable:

Sample frame
Frame from "crowd" sequence for comparing FR, MSU and LI methods

 

Download

Filter unavailable due to contract limitation.You can license Advanced FRC Project result.

E-mail: 

 

Another resources

Video resources:

Public MSU video filters
Here are available VirtualDub and AviSynth filters. Commonly we develop a whole family of some kind of a filter. Generally there are also versions optimized for PC and hardware implementations (ASIC/FPGA/DSP). These optimized versions can be licensed to companies. Please contact us for details via video(at)graphics.cs.msu_ru.
MSU filters for companies
We are working with Intel, Samsung, RealNetworks and other companies on adapting our filters other video processing algorithms for specific video streams, applications and hardware like TV-sets, graphics cards, etc. Some of such projects are non-exclusive. Also we have internal researches. Please let us know via video(at)graphics.cs.msu_ru if you are interested in acquiring a license for such filters or making a custom R&D project on video processing, compression, computer vision.
Codecs comparisons
Objective and subjective quality evaluation
tests for video and image codecs
Ads link: x264 parameters efficiency comparison
Video quality metrics
Programs with different objective and subjective video quality metrics implementation
Video codecs projects
Different research and development
projects on video codecs
Other
Other information

Bookmark this page:   Add to Del.icio.us Add to Del.icio.us     Digg It Digg It     reddit reddit

 
Last updated: 07-December-2007

Search (Russian):
Server size: 7476 files, 920Mb (Server statistics)

Project updated by
Server Team and MSU Video Group


Project sponsored by YUVsoft Corp.

Project supported by MSU Graphics & Media Lab

 
---------------------------------------------------------
  Send your comments to compression_##_graphicon.ru
  © Dr. D.Vatolin, Dr. M.Smirnov, A.Ratushnyak, V.Yoockin, content, 2001-2008
  © A.Andreev, pictures, 2002

Rambler's Top100 Рейтинг@Mail.ru

This document available from http://www.compression.ru/video/frame_rate_conversion/index_en.html