![]() |
||
|
Compression project
(most info is in Russian)
>> About
In English: Video >> Public filters | Com. filters | Video Codecs Comparisons | Our Video Codecs | Video Quality Metrics || New: Compression Catalog! Personal (English) >> V.Yoockin | A.Ratushnyak In Russian: "Compression Methods" book | Arctest | Download | FIDO | Forum | Links |
||
| Hot news: * 4-th H.264 codecs test! * Million filters downloads! * Video Quality Metric 1.5! |
| If you find a spelling error, please select an incorrect text and press Ctrl+Enter. Thank you! |
MSU Frame Rate Conversion Method
|
![]() Double up-conversion of the frame rate |
The main advantages of the method are:
This is achieved by construction of compensated frames with quarter pixel
accuracy. Such high accuracy is
obtained by using of bilinear and bicubic interpolation. Second advantage
means that interpolated frames
have the same sharpness as the original ones. Note that such the feature is
not common for the
majority of methods of this kind.
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Here we present a results of comparison of described (MSU), Frame Repetition (FR) and Linear Interpolation (LI) methods on "akiyo" sequence. Results include PSNR metric visualization of interpolated frames in comparison to original ones on the right side. Following is the color semantics on these images: red color - high difference region, this difference is visually noticeable; yellow - little less than previous difference; green and blue - almost unnoticeable difference; black - no difference.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||
|
On the pictures bellow there are the frames from sequences with four times increased frame rate. Such the up-conversion is achieved by repeated using of FRC method in accordance to picture:
|
|
|
|||||
|
On the next picture there is the comparison of MSU and LI FRC methods by
the example of conversion of "waterfall" sequence:
|
|
|
|||||
|
Quality comparison of MSU, LI and FR methods is shown at the graphs bellow.
In vertical direction there is PSNR quality level of interpolated frames in
comparison to original ones
(the higher values of metric means the higher quality of interpolated
frames), in horizontal direction
interpolated frame numbers are marked.
|
|
|
|||||
|
Below there is a comparison of MSU and UCSD (University of California, San Diego) FRC methods. Sequences with four times increased frame rate were used for this comparison:
|
|
|
|||||
|
On the pictures bellow it is easy to see the sharpness difference on frames,
which were calculated
by increasing FPS four times:
|
|
|
|||||
|
Two sequences where the quality difference of MSU and UCSD methods can be
clearly seen are available for download. In these sequences each frame
contains the same part of frame from sequence processed by FR, MSU and LI.
This method of sequence generation makes comparison of FRC methods easy and
comfortable:
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Filter unavailable due to contract limitation.You can license Advanced FRC Project result.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Send your comments to
compression_##_graphicon.ru © Dr. D.Vatolin, Dr. M.Smirnov, A.Ratushnyak, V.Yoockin, content, 2001-2008 © A.Andreev, pictures, 2002 |
||