Ru / En

Hot news:

If you find a spelling error, please select an incorrect text and press Ctrl+Enter. Thank you!

Compression project >> Video Area Home
РУССКИЙ
Graphics & Media Lab

Advanced Frame Rate Converter (AFRC)

MSU Graphics & Media Lab (Video Group)

Algorithm, ideas: Dr. Dmitriy Vatolin
Algorithm, implementation: Sergey Grishin

FRC (Frame Rate Conversion) algorithms are used in compression, video format conversion, quality enhancement, stereo vision, etc. The most popular application is format conversion. This is the case when FRC is used in order to convert the frame rate of video stream. It is needed for example in order to playback 50Hz video sequence using TV set with 100Hz frame rate. FRC makes the motion of objects smoother and therefore more pleasant for eyes. It allows to slow down the playback speed thus making the objects' movements more evident.

FRC scheme
Pic.1 Basic scheme of FRC

FRC algorithm increases the total number of frames in the video sequence. This is performed by inserting new frames (interpolated frames) between each pair of neighbor frames of original video sequence (see pic.1). The number of interpolated frames between each pair of original frames is defined by the interpolation factor. Interpolation factor is a user defined parameter and can be equal to any positive integer number.

Main advantage of developed algorithm is using of several quality enhancement techniques such as adaptive artifact masking, black stripe processing and occlusion tracking:


Examples


This section contains performance results of developed algorithm and its comparison with methods of other companies.

First example (pic. 2-4) demonstrates result obtained using 'schumacher' test video sequence. Interpolated frame (see pic. 4) is calculated by developed algorithm using two reference frames (pic. 2,3). Presented interpolated frame located in the centre position in time domain between reference frames.

Previous reference frame
Pic.2 Previous reference frame
Next reference frame
Pic.3 Next reference frame
Interpolated frame
Pic.4 Interpolated frame

Quality comparison of the developed method and other companies' methods is shown at the pictures below. First example shows performance result for test video sequence 'stefan'. Interpolated frames are obtained during conversion of input video stream with interpolation factor equaling 2. The number of interpolated frame in output video sequence is 339.

Previous reference frame
Pic.5 Previous reference frame
Next reference frame
Pic.6 Next reference frame
Retimer result
Pic.7 Retimer result
Motion Perfect result
Pic.8 Motion Perfect result
Twixtor result
Pic.9 Twixtor result
AFRC result
Pic.10 AFRC result

Next example shows performance result for test video sequence 'foreman'. Interpolated frames are obtained during x1 conversion (sequence is firstly decimated with factor 2 and decimated frames are then interpolated) of input video stream. The number of interpolated frame in output video sequence is 171.

Previous reference frame
Pic.11 Previous reference frame
Next reference frame
Pic.12 Next reference frame
Retimer result
Pic.13 Retimer result
Motion Perfect result
Pic.14 Motion Perfect result
Twixtor result
Pic.15 Twixtor result
AFRC result
Pic.16 AFRC result

Next diagram (see pic. 17) demonstrates the results of objective comparison. The objective quality of processed sequences for various methods was measured using Y-PSNR. During PSNR calculation only interpolated frames had been used. In order to do that original video sequences are first decimated with factor 2 and then decimated frames are recovered using FRC. After that interpolated frames are compared with frames from original video sequences using Y-PSNR metric.
Vertical axis is marked with average Y-PSNR values for each sequence, horizontal one - by test sequences' names. As it can be clearly seen the developed algorithm (AFRC) shows the best objective quality result.

Diagram
Pic. 17 Objective comparison result


Publications



Download


For commercial license of this filter please contact us via

сontact email


Another resources


Video resources:

Call for MPEG4-AVC/H.264 codecs 2012

Public MSU video filters
Here are available VirtualDub and AviSynth filters. For a given type of digital video filtration we typically develop a family of different algorithms and implementations. Generally there are also versions optimized for PC and hardware implementations (ASIC/FPGA/DSP). These optimized versions can be licensed to companies. Please contact us for details via video(at)graphics.cs.msu_ru.
MSU/YUVsoft filters for companies
We are working with Intel, Samsung, RealNetworks and other companies on adapting our filters other video processing algorithms for specific video streams, applications and hardware like TV-sets, graphics cards, etc. Some of such projects are non-exclusive. Also we have internal researches. Please let us know via video(at)graphics.cs.msu_ru if you are interested in acquiring a license for such filters or making a custom R&D project on video processing, compression, computer vision.
Codecs comparisons
Objective and subjective quality evaluation
tests for video and image codecs
Call for MPEG4-AVC/H.264 codecs 2012
Ext. link: x264 parameters efficiency comparison
MSU Video Quality Measurement tools
Programs with different objective and subjective video quality metrics implementation
Video codecs projects
Different research and development
projects on video codecs
Other
Other information

Bookmark this page:   Add to Del.icio.us Add to Del.icio.us     Digg It Digg It     reddit reddit


 
Last updated: 10-March-2011

Search (Russian):
Server size: 8069 files, 1215Mb (Server statistics)

Project updated by
Server Team and MSU Video Group


Project sponsored by YUVsoft Corp.

Project supported by MSU Graphics & Media Lab

Rambler's Top100 Рейтинг@Mail.ru