Hot news:

If you find a spelling error, please select an incorrect text and press Ctrl+Enter. Thank you!

Compression project >> Video Area Home

HEVC Video Codecs Comparison
(Eleventh MSU Video Codecs Comparison)

MSU Graphics & Media Lab (Video Group)



UPDATE 26/12/2016 4K video encoders comparison is anounced

Video group head: Dr. Dmitriy Vatolin

Project head: Dr. Dmitriy Kulikov

Measurements, analysis: Mikhail Erofeev,
Stanislav Dolganov,
Sergey Zvezdakov

There is Pro Version of HEVC Comparison 2016 report:

Free Version Free 4K video Version Pro Version (Enterprise) Pro+ Version (Enterprise + 4K video analysis)
Objective Metrics SSIM SSIM, PSNR
Different types of analysis
Encoding quality, encoding speed, bitarte handling, speed/quality analysis etc. (some graphs) Encoding quality, encoding speed, bitarte handling, speed/quality analysis etc.
ColorPlanes Only overall YUV Y, U, V and overall YUV
Graphs Some graphs All the graphs for all the metrcis, codecs and presets
Test video sequences 27 HD video (only description) 10 4K video (only description) 27 HD video (available for download) 27 HD video + 10 4K video (available for download)
Tested uses-cases 3 different use cases:
Fast Transcoding, Universal and Ripping (some graphs)
4K transcoding(some graphs) 3 different use cases:
Fast Transcoding, Universal and Ripping
3 different use cases:
Fast Transcoding, Universal and Ripping + 4K transcoding
Number of figures 48 19 3000+ 4000+
Price Free Free $850 $985
Purchase Download Download Buy Buy
Hint: You can remove "Extended download" service while purchasing to save money.
We can help you to analyze your codec

Pro version of comparison will be available immediately after report purchasing.

Report Overview



Video Codecs that Were Tested


  • HEVC
  • Chips&Media HEVC Encoder
  • Intel MSS HEVC Encoder
  • Kingsoft HEVC Encoder
  • nj265
  • SHBPH.265 Real time encoder
  • x265
  • Non HEVC
  • nj264
  • x264

  • Overview



    Objectives and Testing Tools


    HEVC Codec Testing Objectives

    The main goal of this report is the presentation of a comparative evaluation of the quality of new HEVC codecs and codecs of other standards using objective measures of assessment. The comparison was done using settings provided by the developers of each codec. Nevertheless, we required all presets to satisfy minimum speed requirement on the particular use case. The main task of the comparison is to analyze different encoders for the task of transcoding videoe.g., compressing video for personal use.

    HEVC Codec Testing Rools

    The comparison was performed on Corei7 6700K (Skylake) @4Ghz, RAM 8GB, Windows8.1. For this platform we considered three key use cases with different speed requirements.

    Video sequences selection

    Video sequences for all of MSU video codec comaprison reports were choosen by MSU team through manual selection. Various videos were selected to help to find the strengths and weaknesses of video encoders. This comparisons test dataset was significantly updated. Our goal was to create dataset with videos that encoders are facing in everyday life. For this purpose 30000 videos from Vimeo service were analyzed and 885 4K videos with high bitrate were analyzed. These videos were clusterized (by spatial and temporal complexity) and 27 video from the clusters were chosen.

    Video sequecnes selection

    Overall Conclusions

    Overall, the leaders in this comparison are Intel MSS HEVC and Kingsoft HEVC encoders! Here are some overall graphs from report:
    Speed/Quality trade-off for Fast use-case (YUV-SSIM metric)
    Average bitrate for Universal use-case (YUV-SSIM metric)
    Average bitrate for all use-cases (YUV-SSIM metric)

    Professional Versions of Comparison Report


    HEVC Comparison Report Pro 2016 version contains:
  • Additional objective metrics (PSNR, SSIM)
  • All metrics results for all colorplanes (Y,U,V and overall)
  • Results for all the sequences, codecs and presets used in comparison
  • Much more figures
  • etc.

  • Acknowledgments


    The Graphics & Media Lab Video Group would like to express its gratitude to the following companies for providing the codecs and settings used in this report:
  • Intel Corporation
  • System house Business partners company
  • x264 developer team
  • MulticoreWare, Inc.
  • Nanjing Yunyan
  • Kingsoft
  • Chips&Media Inc.
  • The Video Group would also like to thank these companies for their help and technical support during the tests.

    Thanks


    Special thanks to the following contributors of our previous comparisons

    Google Intel AMD NVidia
    ATI Adobe ISPhone dicas
    KDDI R&D labs Dolby Tata Elxsi Octasic
    Qualcomm Voceweb Elgato

    Codec Analysis and Tuning for Codec Developers and Codec Users


    Computer Graphics and Multimedia Laboratory of Moscow State University:

  • 11 years working in the area of video codec analysis and tuning using objective quality metrics and subjective comparisons.
  • 25+ reports of video codec comparisons and analysis (H.264, MPEG-4 MPEG-2, decoders error recovery).
  • Methods and algorithms for codec comparison and analysis development, separate codecs features and codecs options analysis.
  • We could perform next task for codec developers and codec users.

    Strong and Weak Points of Your Codec

  • Deep encoder parts analysis (ME, RC on GOP, mode decision, etc).
  • Weak and strong points for your encoder and complete information about encoding quality on different content types.
  • Encoding Quality improvement by the pre and post filtering (including technologies licensing).
  • Independent Codec Estimation Comparing to Other Codecs for Different Use-cases

  • Comparative analysis of your encoder and other encoders.
  • We have direct contact with many codec developers.
  • You will know place of your encoder between other newest well-known encoders (compare encoding quality, speed, bitrate handling, etc.).
  • Encoder Features Implementation Optimality Analysis

    We perform encoder features effectiveness (speed/quality trade-off) analysis that could lead up to 30% increase in the speed/quality characteristics of your codec. We can help you to tune your codec and find best encoding parameters.

    Contact Information


    See all MSU Video Codec Comparisons

    MSU video codecs comparisons resources:


    Other Materials


    Video resources:

    Bookmark this page:   Add to Del.icio.us Add to Del.icio.us     Digg It Digg It     reddit reddit


     
    Last updated: 26-December-2016

    Search (Russian):
    Server size: 8069 files, 1215Mb (Server statistics)

    Project updated by
    Server Team and MSU Video Group


    Project sponsored by YUVsoft Corp.

    Project supported by MSU Graphics & Media Lab

    Rambler's Top100 @Mail.ru